When a client needs help with federal or state wage and hour issues, our labor and employment attorneys bring a wide range of experience to the table. We help companies address all such issues, including:
- Determining which employees may be exempt from overtime pay and minimum wages;
- How certain bonuses and other payments may affect overtime pay;
- Which pre-shift and post-shift activities may be compensable;
- What travel time may be compensable;
- What breaks are required; and
- What breaks are compensable.
We conduct compliance audits, assist with structuring pay systems, and assist with wage and hour issues applicable to various government contracts.
We're also there for clients when the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) gets involved. In recent years the DOL has stepped up the number of its employer investigations, and wage and hour litigation has increased dramatically. We represent companies before the DOL during investigations and audits, defend on child labor law issues, and obtain opinion letters for clients from the DOL on a variety of novel matters.
Given the more employee-friendly environment that has surfaced as a result of increased federal funding and new legislation, employers should expect the DOL and other agencies to more aggressively enforce laws in cases that might have been considered marginal in the past. Companies should consider self-audits and other internal compliance reviews to avoid being on the receiving end of agency investigations and enforcement actions, as well as private litigation. Baker Donelson can assist with those internal reviews.
Employers should also expect a continued increase in single-plaintiff and collective action wage and hour litigation. Baker Donelson attorneys have handled more than 110 collective actions in the last several years. These include cases for national restaurant chains, food processors, cable/satellite/telecom companies, transportation companies and energy companies. In cases throughout the country, our attorneys have successfully argued that classes should not be certified under Rule 23 in Title VII cases, that collective actions under the FLSA should not be certified or should be decertified, and that claims brought by multiple named plaintiffs should be severed and litigated in separate suits. These favorable rulings have often been followed by successful resolution of the litigation, through nuisance value settlement, summary judgment or defense verdict after trial.